Enforcing Consumer Guarantees: Sabah Hanif v Car Mart Direct Pty Ltd Case Study
In the case of Hanif v Car Mart Direct Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCATCD, the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal addressed critical issues under the Australian Consumer Law, specifically focusing on consumer guarantees and misleading representations.
Represented by Arida Lawyers Pty Ltd, Sabah Hanif successfully argued that the 2012 Mazda CX5 she purchased was not only defective but also misrepresented in terms of odometer readings and interior specifications. This decision underscores the obligations of businesses to adhere to truthful advertising and the enforceable rights of consumers to receive products that meet advertised standards and are of acceptable quality.
Sabah Hanif v Car Mart Direct Pty Ltd [2023] NSWCATCD
Overview
​
In the matter of Sabah Hanif v Car Mart Direct Pty Ltd, the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal delivered a decision underscoring the protections afforded to consumers under the Australian Consumer Law (ACL).
This case, although not a landmark in legal precedent, remains significant for its detailed application of consumer guarantees and the responsibilities of dealerships in consumer transactions.
The legal representation by Arida Lawyers was pivotal in addressing complex aspects of consumer rights, particularly around consumer guarantees and misleading and deceptive conduct in trade or commerce.
Case Background
​
The dispute centred on Ms Sabah Hanif's purchase of a 2012 Mazda CX5 from Car Mart Direct Pty Ltd, which was found to be defective and not as described in the initial advertisement. After experiencing multiple mechanical failures and observing discrepancies in the vehicle's description (such as odometer reading and interior colour), Ms Hanif sought legal redress from Car Mart Direct Pty Ltd (Dealership) through the Tribunal.
Legal Issues and Tribunal's Findings
Contravention of Consumer Guarantees
The Tribunal found that the mechanical defects, the unsafe condition and the discrepancy in the vehicle's features from that advertised by the Dealership, resulted in the Dealership contravening the consumer guarantees of acceptable quality, fit for purpose and supply of goods by description pursuant to sections 54, 55 and 56 of the ACL. This finding allowed Ms Hanif to reject the vehicle and obtain a full a refund of the purchase price paid, as well as the damages she suffered that were reasonably connected to the supply of the vehicle.
​
Misleading and Deceptive Conduct:
The Tribunal further made findings of misleading representations made by the Dealership. Ms Hanif was led to believe she was purchasing a vehicle different from what was delivered. The vehicle's condition and specifications significantly deviated from the advertisement, particularly the vehicles odometer reading and its interior colour.
Tribunal's Orders
In the premises of the above findings, the Tribunal ordered the Dealership to:
1. Accept the return of the defective vehicle.
​
2. Refund Ms Hanif the purchase price paid for the vehicle.
3. Compensate Ms Hanif for the consequential losses she incurred resulting from the supply of the vehicle, including the towing costs and expert fees.
​​
Implications for Consumer Rights and Business Responsibilities
​
This case reinforces the importance of accurate representations in consumer transactions and the consequences of contravening the ACL consumer guarantees. It further demonstrates the legal recourse available to consumers when products fail to meet expected standards and when misleading information influences purchasing decisions.
While not establishing new legal principles, the decision in Hanif v Car Mart Direct Pty Ltd serves as a good example of consumer protection in action. It highlights the diligent efforts of legal representatives like Arida Lawyers in advocating for consumer rights and ensuring businesses adhere to their obligations under the ACL.
This case is a reminder for consumers of their rights and for businesses about the importance of transparency and honesty in product descriptions and sales practices.
​
Do you need help with your defective or lemon vehicle or caravan?
We understand that motor vehicles and caravan purchases are a significant spend and generally by way of finance and as such you should expect to receive a working and functional vehicle free from defects. If you are not satisfied, please contact us for a free 10-minute initial consultation.
At Arida Lawyers, we provide a variety of legal services focused on the Australian Consumer Law. We know that navigating the intricacies of these laws can be challenging, and we are committed to guiding you through every step.
​
​This article provides general information relevant to our expert services. It is not legal advice and should not be relied upon as such. If you are seeking legal advice, you should contact us for a free initial consultation.
​
Liability limited by a scheme approved under Professional Standards Legislation.
​